We deliver what we recommend
A classic firm hands over a report and stops there. We have a delivery team behind us: if the recommendation is to build, we build. Which forces us to recommend only what can genuinely be done.
Framing the use cases, judging feasibility, data governance. No gadgets and no promises.
Many organisations now have a conversational assistant open in a tab and no industrialised use. The gap between the two is not technical, it is methodological: nobody has decided which use cases deserve to be built out, nor who answers when the model gets it wrong.
We start from your processes, not from vendors’ announcements. We identify the tasks where automatic generation or extraction produces a measurable gain, we assess real feasibility against the quality of your data, and we put the safeguards in place: who checks, who is responsible, what data is allowed to leave your premises.
We do not sell proofs of concept for the demonstration. An AI use case that does not survive three months of real use should not have been launched.
A classic firm hands over a report and stops there. We have a delivery team behind us: if the recommendation is to build, we build. Which forces us to recommend only what can genuinely be done.
You do not get a junior consultant with a template. Karim or Jordan carries the file, with real experience of running a business, in France and abroad.
Our daily rate sits between €450 and €550 excl. VAT, where comparable firms charge €650 to €900. The difference is not the skill, it is the cost structure.
Two to three weeks for the Flash Strategic Audit, then a six-month roadmap.
We start from your processes, not from vendors' announcements. We look for the tasks where automatic generation or extraction produces a measurable gain, and we set the rest aside.
Your figures, your tools, what actually happens day to day. A diagnosis built on impressions can be argued with; built on data, it can be decided on.
Cost, timeline, expected gain, risk. Including the workstreams we advise against.
Together we settle what gets done, what waits and what will never happen. Launching three workstreams with a team that can carry one is the most common failure scenario.
A document your teams can execute on their own. What follows is up to you: you execute, or we execute with you.
These amounts are starting points. The quote comes after the framing, never before.
From
Two weeks. Prioritised use cases, feasibility settled, safeguards in place.
From
To steer the transformation over time, once the roadmap is set.
We also work by the day, between €450 and €550 excl. VAT depending on the profile involved. Useful for a single decision or a project review.
With a high-volume task, low stakes if it goes wrong, and whose result is easy to check. Starting with a critical case is the best way to burn the subject internally at the first visible error.
That is precisely what the engagement settles, sector by sector and item by item. When the answer is no, self-hosted architectures exist: they cost more to run, and that cost has to be weighed beforehand, not discovered afterwards.
Rarely, and it is the most expensive mistake we see. In the great majority of cases, an existing model properly fed with your documents is enough, for a fraction of the budget.
On the time spent before and after, and on the proportion of outputs usable without correction. Those two indicators are set during framing. Without them, everybody has an opinion and nobody has an answer.
Yes, through the Agency division for integration into your tools. We also have our own product built on the French legal and accounting framework, CoBIos.
Fifteen minutes to say whether it is feasible, what it takes, and whether it is worth it.
Book a call