Every answer cites its source
The agent answers from your documents and points to the passage its answer is based on. An answer without a source is not sent: the person reading it can trace it back to the text in one click.
For SMEs and mid-sized companies: your teams ask their questions, and the agent answers from your procedures, contracts or reference standards, cites its source and says when it does not know.
An AI agent answers from your own documents, procedures, contracts or reference standards, and can take action in your tools. Before answering, it looks for the relevant passages, builds its answer from them and cites the source. This is known as RAG, and Bonne Idée applies it to all its agents so that every answer can be checked.
A language model on its own answers with confidence, even when it is wrong. Grounded in your texts, the agent instead says it cannot find an answer when nothing in your documents matches.
It can also act: answer your teams from your procedures, check a contract or a file against a reference standard, gather the documents for a file, prepare follow-ups. Human approval remains built in wherever a mistake is costly.
Our own agent, CoBIos, co-built with the Orléans Commercial Court Registry, works this way. Our AI agents are built on your documents; CoBIos is our ready-made agent for accounting and law firms; BIA is our sovereign AI workspace, run locally.
The agent answers from your documents and points to the passage its answer is based on. An answer without a source is not sent: the person reading it can trace it back to the text in one click.
Before go-live, the agent is run on a test set of questions written with you. The share of correct, sourced answers is known, then measured again whenever the model or the documents change.
When nothing in your documents answers the question, the agent says so. What it is allowed to do on its own, and what waits for human approval, is decided action by action.
Two weeks of scoping, then two-week sprints.
The questions the agent has to handle, the documents that are authoritative, those that are out of date, and who is allowed to see what.
A first agent on a sample of documents, queried with real questions from your teams.
A test set of questions written with you, with the correct answers. We measure the share of correct, sourced answers before any go-live.
The agent connected to your tools, access rights respected, your teams onboarded.
Unanswered questions feed the corpus, out-of-date documents are removed, and quality is measured again.
A first agent can be queried from the first two-week sprint, after the two weeks of scoping. Three things change the timeline:
A narrow first agent that is live and measured is better than an agent that covers everything and that nobody dares to use.
The risk of a made-up answer never falls to zero. It can be measured, and that is the condition for putting an agent in your teams’ hands.
We write a series of real questions with you, each with the correct answer and the document that supports it. Every version of the agent is run on this set, and every answer is classified: correct and sourced, correct but poorly sourced, wrong, or « I don’t know. » An agent that admits it cannot find an answer is better than one that makes things up, so the last category counts as good behavior.
Errors almost always point to a specific cause: a missing document, an out-of-date version, an ambiguous question. We fix the corpus, measure again, and go-live only happens once the score agreed during scoping is reached. The same set is then used every time the model or the documents change.
An agent can read, search, summarize, prepare a document, fill in a field or suggest a follow-up. The line between what it does on its own and what waits for human approval is drawn during scoping, action by action, according to what a mistake would cost.
The rule we apply: anything that goes out to a customer, commits money or changes reference data goes through a person. Every action is recorded in a log, so you know at any time what the agent did, based on which source, and who approved it.
When the agent needs to trigger sequences of steps in your tools, we back it with an automation hosted in your own environment. If your teams first need to learn how to use it, the Consulting practice prepares the ground with adoption and change management.
Take a common situation: an SME whose quality procedures, technical data sheets and internal rules are spread between a file server and a few people’s heads. The same questions come back every week, put to the same people.
Unanswered questions show which documents are missing, and that is often the first benefit of the project.
Connect the agent to your tools, build it into an application, or first decide where AI pays off.
Drafting, extracting, classifying: a language model handles it inside your tools, without exposing your data.
BI productOur sovereign AI workspace, run locally, for regulated professions and sensitive data.
A first version of your product, used by real users in twelve weeks, to find out whether it deserves to go further.
A custom internal tool that replaces the spreadsheet and the re-keying, used by your teams in four months, scoping included.
Our AI agent for accounting firms, lawyers and legal professionals: every answer cites its source.
Consulting divisionFind out where AI pays off in your business, use case by use case, and what you are better off not launching.
CoBIos answers from the texts and cites its source, like the agents we build for you.
An agent reads your documents: where they are stored and who has access to them matters as much as the quality of the answers. The agent respects the access rights already defined in your tools. A data processing agreement (DPA) is signed with the contract, everything is hosted in France by default, or on your own infrastructure when nothing must leave, and no model is trained on your documents.
We integrate AI for commercial court registries, public and ministerial officers who are demanding on this point. Human review and what GDPR and the EU AI Act require are set out on our AI guarantees and data sovereignty page.
Retrieval-augmented generation: the model first searches your documents, then answers from what it found. This is what makes it possible to cite a source and limit made-up answers.
A chatbot answers. An agent can also act in your tools: fill in, check, prepare, follow up. During scoping we define what it is allowed to do on its own and what requires approval.
By requiring the agent to cite its sources, by having it say when it cannot find an answer, and by measuring its quality on a test set of questions before go-live. The risk never falls to zero, hence human approval wherever a mistake is costly.
Often not quite, and that is normal. Scoping identifies the documents that are out of date, contradictory or impossible to find, and decides which ones are authoritative. Putting them in order is part of the project. A smaller but up-to-date corpus gives better answers than a complete one where three versions of the same procedure contradict each other.
In France by default, or on your own infrastructure when nothing must leave. The agent respects the access rights already defined in your tools.
A free first call, by video: the first agent to build, and on which documents.
Book a call