“We do not know how much time goes into re-typing.”
That is exactly the subject. Those tasks appear nowhere in your accounts, and they often add up to several days a month.
Mapping the repetitive tasks, the time actually spent, the achievable gain. Before anything is built. The thirty-minute diagnosis is free.
If one of the three sounds like you, the rest of this page concerns you.
That is exactly the subject. Those tasks appear nowhere in your accounts, and they often add up to several days a month.
What pays back most, measured: how many times a week, how many minutes, by how many people.
The audit also says what is not worth it: a process that changes too often or a volume that is too low.
Re-typing, follow-ups made from memory, files circulating by email: those tasks appear nowhere in your management accounts, and they often add up to several days a month.
The audit starts by measuring. How many times a week, how many minutes, by how many people. That costing is what then allows a decision: what deserves to be automated, and what is not worth it because the process changes too often or the volume is too low.
We also look at what you already pay for. Many organisations have subscriptions to overlapping tools, or a tool oversized for the actual use.
Three things this work has to do for you, and what we put in place for each.
Frequency, duration, number of people: the monthly cost of every repetitive task, in hours.
What deserves to be automated first, and what is better left as it is.
You leave with the costing. The project is another decision, which you take afterwards.
★★★★★I came with a dating app project, and they turned my ideas into a solid, structured specification. For someone like me who does not come from the digital world, that was exactly what I needed.
Alexandre GiorgiApp project
★★★★★They rebuilt our website, they look after it, and they are always available with good advice. I recommend them, real professionals who genuinely care about the project.
Maison Remamaisonrema.com
★★★★★They rose to the challenge on a very tight calendar, without sacrificing the details that matter. The quality of their work is genuinely impressive.
Youssef Hafez DoniaBrand creation
If you cannot answer, that is exactly the subject. Thirty minutes is enough to frame it.
Book my diagnosis
Three areas, in that order, because the first conditions the others.
Frequency, duration, number of people involved. It is that figure that decides what gets automated, not how irritating it feels.
Automating a process that changes every month amounts to rebuilding it every month. We identify what is stable.
Overlapping subscriptions, oversized tools, dormant licences. The audit sometimes pays for itself on that alone.
Our collective is vetted: some thirty specialists selected on their portfolio. Nobody learns on your project.
Karim or Jordan carries your file from end to end. You do not explain the same thing three times to three different people.
Fifteen days, one deliverable. You watch the project move in real time, you adjust, we correct. No tunnel effect.
An audit that drags on for six weeks is an audit whose conclusions are out of date by the time they are presented.
We understand your context, your objectives and what you have already tried. That is what avoids a generic audit telling you what you already know.
We go into your tools and your data. No questionnaire for your teams to fill in: we look ourselves, that is our job.
A conversation, not a PDF sent by email. You leave with a list of prioritised actions, costed in effort and in impact.
Thirty minutes is enough to know whether there is a real subject. If there is not, we say so.
A first look at your situation, with no commitment and no sales pitch.
The full audit is costed after the diagnosis, on the real scope. We do not sell a package before knowing what there is to look at.
Rarely. The point of automation is to make what you already have work together. Changing tool is another project, and a far heavier one.
By interviewing the people who do the task, not those who describe it. The gap between the two is often the main discovery of the audit.
We say so. It has happened, and it is a useful result: it avoids investing in work that would not pay for itself.
That is a design criterion, not an obstacle. When sensitivity demands it, we move towards a self-hosted solution where the data never leaves your infrastructure.
Two weeks, including the interviews with your teams.
If you cannot answer, that is exactly the subject. Thirty minutes is enough to frame it.
Book the diagnosis